01843 830220
Host is unique there is no comparison!
A number of cheap look-a-like products are available on the market. However, none of them can conform to the same environmental standard, cleaning ability or quality of Host.
Other products may appear to be cheaper when comparing like-for-like “on price” However, this case study confirms that cheap brands can actually cost even more!
Host vs Cheap Alternatives
Carpet Cleaning Case Study (24,000 square meter office building, City of London)
Test Results
By comparison, Host used 39% less product to remove ingrained soiling
Host was far more effective at removing spots, spills and coffee stains
Host was more user friendly, more manageable, easier to apply and cleaner to use
Host was much easier to vacuum from carpets after cleaning
Host left the carpet looking cleaner for longer, stains, spots and spills did not come back
Seven disadvantages of cheap brands
Cheap brand was very wet, when used formed into small balls that rolled uncontrollably under furniture.
Cheap brand was hard to work with, product stuck to hands and clothing, unpleasant and messy to use.
Cheap brand was very difficult to remove and took almost twice as long to vacuum out of the carpet.
Cheap brand used 39% more product to clean the same area of carpet to produce “similar” results.
Cheap brand was more labour intensive, costing additional 34% in labour to remove product from the carpet.
Cheap brand was not very effective, additional 22% cost in labour was wasted on removing marks by hand.
Cheap brand did not produce long lasting results; spots / spills came back within just a few days after cleaning.
Conclusion
By comparison to the cheap brand, Host cost 95% less in combined labour and material cost.
Host left the carpets looking cleaner, and left the carpets looking cleaner for longer too!
Cheap brands will cause problems for you and your customer.
Cheap brands do not offer value for money.
Cheap brands will not clean carpets like Host!